Science ‘squeezed out of primary schools’

A Science is being squeezed out of English primary schools, with a third not providing the recommended two hours of teaching a week, research suggests. The Confederation of British Industry study also suggests science has become less of a priority in many schools. A third of 260 teachers surveyed said they lacked confidence teaching science.

B The government said the report was “nonsense”, and its new curriculum “rivals the best in the world”. In the report, Tomorrow’s World, 53% of the teachers surveyed for the CBI said science teaching had become less of a priority over the past five years. And 36% of the schools teaching science at Key Stage 2 said they were not providing the minimum recommendation for science education of two hours every week. Some 20% said they committed over three hours, but 7.5% said they taught less than one hour per week.

C CBI director general John Cridland said: “Science education in primary schools is being squeezed out. How can we expect to inspire future generations of scientists and engineers if we don’t deliver high-quality and inspiring science lessons at primary school age? If we are not careful, too many children will have lost interest in science before they hit their teens. A lack of science, technology, engineering and maths skills are already holding back economic growth, and this will only get worse if we don’t energize the next generation. Pupils need innovative, fun lessons with access to the latest science kit and need to break free of the classroom more to visit cutting-edge companies.”

D Prof. Julia Buckingham, vice-chancellor of Brunel University, London, said: “The report’s findings - indicating that Stem (science, technology, engineering and maths) subjects have become less of a priority in primary schools in recent years. None of us should be in any doubt of the critical importance of ensuring that the education system inspires interest and enthusiasm for the sciences and provides careers advice and guidance as early as possible for school students.”

E A Department for Education spokesperson dismissed the CBI’s findings as “nonsense”. “Science is a compulsory subject in schools from age 5 to 16,” said the spokesperson. “It is a crucial part of our plan to prepare young people for life in modern Britain, and we have made big strides in recent years. A record number of pupils are now taking science at GCSE and we are seeing more young people taking the crucial STEM subjects at A-level. We have introduced a new primary science curriculum to get encourage more young people to study it.”

Adjusted to (1)

squeeze out – vytlačit

stride – pokrok

1) Read the article and match each of the headings to a paragraph.

1 The government disagrees but the research figures are clear

2 Buckingham’s opinion

3 Science has lost its priority

4 Government says the findings are nonsense

5 Science is important for economics

2) Read the article and answer the questions.

1 What was the research about?

2 What were the results of the experiment?

3 How does the government oppose?

4 Who is John Cridland? What does he say?

5 How does science influence future life of the pupils?

3) Explain the following words and phrases.

1 its new curriculum “rivals the best in the world”

2 science education

3 we don’t deliver high-quality and inspiring science lessons

4 break free of the classroom

5 provide careers advice and guidance

4) Answer the following questions.

What is science? How does science education influence development of children? Do you think our government supports science education and research enough? Why not? How should be science taught?

Video:

https://goo.gl/Wmm9Dk

https://goo.gl/aK3aGc

https://goo.gl/c9AF7W

Tips, sources of information:

http://goo.gl/3SwNyU

http://goo.gl/RYBLlA

Source:

(1)

RICHARDSON, Hannah. Science 'squeezed out of primary schools'. BBC News [online]. 2015 [cit. 2015-09-21]. Available at: http://www.bbc.com/news/education-31749900