Science ‘squeezed out of primary schools’
B
The government said the report was “nonsense”, and its new
curriculum “rivals the best in the world”. In the report, Tomorrow’s World,
53% of the teachers surveyed for the CBI said science teaching had become less
of a priority over the past five years. And 36% of the schools teaching science
at Key Stage 2 said they were not providing the minimum recommendation for
science education of two hours every week. Some 20% said they committed over
three hours, but 7.5% said they taught less than one hour per week.
C
CBI director general John Cridland said: “Science education
in primary schools is being squeezed out. How can we expect to inspire future
generations of scientists and engineers if we don’t deliver high-quality and
inspiring science lessons at primary school age? If we are not careful, too
many children will have lost interest in science before they hit their teens. A
lack of science, technology, engineering and maths skills are already holding
back economic growth, and this will only get worse if we don’t energize the
next generation. Pupils need innovative, fun lessons with access to the latest
science kit and need to break free of the classroom more to visit
cutting-edge companies.”
D
Prof. Julia Buckingham, vice-chancellor of Brunel
University, London, said: “The report’s findings -
indicating that Stem (science, technology, engineering and maths) subjects have
become less of a priority in primary schools in recent years. None of us should
be in any doubt of the critical importance of ensuring that the education
system inspires interest and enthusiasm for the sciences and provides
careers advice and guidance as early as possible for school students.”
E A
Department for Education spokesperson dismissed the CBI’s findings as “nonsense”.
“Science is a compulsory subject in schools from age 5 to 16,” said the spokesperson. “It
is a crucial part of our plan to prepare young people for life in modern Britain, and we
have made big strides in recent
years. A record number of pupils are now taking science at GCSE and we are
seeing more young people taking the crucial STEM subjects at A-level. We have
introduced a new primary science curriculum to get encourage more young people
to study it.”
Adjusted to (1)
squeeze
out – vytlačit
stride
– pokrok
1) Read the article and match each of the headings to
a paragraph.
1 The government disagrees but the research
figures are clear
2 Buckingham’s opinion
3 Science has lost its priority
4 Government says the findings are nonsense
5 Science is important for economics
2) Read the article and answer the questions.
1 What was the research about?
2 What were the results of the experiment?
3 How does the government oppose?
4 Who is John Cridland? What does he say?
5 How does science influence future life of the pupils?
3) Explain the following words and phrases.
1 its new curriculum “rivals the best in the
world”
2 science education
3 we don’t deliver high-quality and inspiring
science lessons
4 break free of the classroom
5 provide careers advice and guidance
4) Answer the following questions.
What is science? How does science education influence
development of children? Do you think our government supports science education
and research enough? Why not? How should be science taught?
Video:
Tips, sources of information:
Source:
(1)
RICHARDSON,
Hannah. Science 'squeezed out of primary schools'. BBC News [online].
2015 [cit. 2015-09-21]. Available at:
http://www.bbc.com/news/education-31749900
